Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV agoraphobia in the World Mental Health Surveys

  • on behalf of the WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators
  • University of Groningen
  • The University of Queensland
  • TU Dresden
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • University of Cape Town
  • Wroclaw Medical University
  • Al-Qadisiya University
  • Stony Brook University School of Medicine
  • Federal University of Espírito Santo
  • Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  • University Hospital Gasthuisberg
  • National School of Public Health, Management and Professional Development
  • University College Hospital, Ibadan
  • Universitat de Barcelona
  • Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
  • University of Balamand
  • St George Hospital University Medical Center
  • Institute for Development, Research, Advocacy and Applied Care, Beirut
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa
  • University of Tokyo
  • University Paris Diderot and Paris Descartes
  • Ministry of Health Israel
  • National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Publica
  • Servicio Murciano de Salud
  • Ulster University
  • National Institute of Health
  • Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca University
  • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
  • CES University
  • Harvard Medical School
  • University of Otago

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version 5 (DSM-5) definition of agoraphobia (AG) as an independent diagnostic entity makes it timely to re-examine the epidemiology of AG. Study objective was to present representative data on the characteristics of individuals who meet DSM-IV criteria for AG (AG without a history of panic disorder [PD] and PD with AG) but not DSM-5 criteria, DSM-5 but not DSM-IV criteria, or both sets of criteria. Methods: Population-based surveys from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative including adult respondents (n = 136,357) from 27 countries across the world. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview was used to assess AG and other disorders. Results: Lifetime and 12-month prevalence estimates of DSM-5 AG (1.5% and 1.0%) were comparable to DSM-IV (1.4% and 0.9%). Of respondents meeting criteria in either system, 57.1% met criteria in both, while 24.2% met criteria for DSM-5 only and 18.8% for DSM-IV only. Severe role impairment due to AG was reported by a lower proportion of respondents who met criteria only for DSM-IV AG (30.4%) than those with both DSM-5 and DSM-IV AG (44.0%; χ 21 = 4.7; P = 0.031). The proportion of cases with any comorbidity was lower among respondents who met criteria only for DSM-IV AG (78.7%) than those who met both sets (92.9%; χ 21= 14.5; P < 0.001). Conclusions: This first large survey shows that, compared to the DSM-IV, the DSM-5 identifies a substantial group of new cases with AG, while the prevalence rate remains stable at 1.5%. Severity and comorbidity are higher in individuals meeting DSM-5 AG criteria compared with individuals meeting DSM-IV AG criteria only.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-510
Number of pages12
JournalDepression and Anxiety
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • agoraphobia
  • anxiety/anxiety disorders
  • cross-national
  • disorders
  • epidemiology
  • phobia/phobic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of DSM-5 and DSM-IV agoraphobia in the World Mental Health Surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this