Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A systems framework for planning and evaluating capacity development in conservation: recommendations for practitioners

  • Ana L. Porzecanski
  • , Eleanor J. Sterling
  • , Jamieson A. Copsey
  • , Michael R. Appleton
  • , James R. Barborak
  • , Brett L. Bruyere
  • , Nora Bynum
  • , Kay H. Farmer
  • , Ryan Finchum
  • , Domoina Rakotobe
  • , Ricardo B. Stanoss
  • , Armando Valdés-Velásquez
  • American Museum of Natural History
  • IUCN Species Survival Commission
  • Re:wild
  • Colorado State University
  • Colorado State University
  • Amazon Center for Environmental Education and Research
  • Wild Ally
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Capacity development is increasingly recognized as central to conservation goals. Efforts to develop individual, organizational and societal capacity underpin direct investments in biodiversity conservation and natural resource management, and sustain their impact over time. In the face of urgent needs and increasingly complex contexts for conservation the sector not only needs more capacity development, it needs new approaches to capacity development. The sector is embracing the dynamic relationships between the ecological, political, social and economic dimensions of conservation. Capacity development practitioners should ensure that individuals, organizations and communities are prepared to work effectively in these complex environments of constant change to transform the systems that drive biodiversity loss and unsustainable, unequitable resource use. Here we advocate for a systems view of capacity development. We propose a conceptual framework that aligns capacity development components with all stages of conservation efforts, fosters attention to context, and coordinates with parallel efforts to engage across practitioners and sectors for more systemic impact. Furthermore, we highlight a need for practitioners to target, measure and support vital elements of capacity that have traditionally received less attention, such as values and motivation, leadership and organizational culture, and governance and participation by using approaches from psychology, the social sciences and systems thinking. Drawing from conservation and other sectors, we highlight examples of approaches that can support reflective practice, so capacity development practitioners can better understand the factors that favour or hinder effectiveness of interventions and influence system-wide change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)671-680
Number of pages10
JournalORYX
Volume56
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Capacity development
  • conservation
  • evaluation
  • framework
  • leadership
  • learning loops
  • planning
  • systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systems framework for planning and evaluating capacity development in conservation: recommendations for practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this