Abstract
Summary: This study examined pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) acceptability among female sex workers, male-to-female transgendered persons and men who have sex with men in Lima, Peru. Focus groups explored social issues associated with PrEP acceptability and conjoint analysis assessed preferences among eight hypothetical PrEP scenarios with varying attribute profiles and their relative impact on acceptability. Conjoint analysis revealed that PrEP acceptability ranged from 19.8 to 82.5 out of a possible score of 100 across the eight hypothetical PrEP scenarios. Out-of-pocket cost had the greatest impact on PrEP acceptability (25.2, P, 0.001), followed by efficacy (21.4, P, 0.001) and potential side-effects (14.7, P, 0.001). Focus group data supported these findings, and also revealed that potential sexual risk disinhibition, stigma and discrimination associated with PrEP use, and mistrust of health-care professionals were also concerns. These issues will require careful attention when planning for PrEP roll-out.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 256-262 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | International Journal of STD and AIDS |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- Acceptability
- FSW
- HIV
- MSM
- Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
- South America
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Acceptability of pre-exposure prophylaxis as an HIV prevention strategy: Barriers and facilitators to pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among at-risk peruvian populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver