Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Addition of amifostine to the CHOP regimen in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A phase II trial showing reduction in toxicity without altering long-term survival

  • Henry L. Gómez
  • , César Samanéz
  • , Frank Campana
  • , Silvia P. Neciosup
  • , Luis Vera
  • , Luis Casanova
  • , Jorge Leon
  • , Claudio Flores
  • , Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza
  • , Carlos A. Casteñeda
  • , Joseph A. Pinto
  • , Carlos S. Vallejos
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Eduardo Cáceres Graziani
  • Hospital Nacionale Edgardo Rebagliati
  • AUNA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We report the 8-year follow-up of 34 patients aged ≥ 69 years old with NHL included in a phase IIb open-label randomized parallel groups study to evaluate the effectiveness of amifostine in preventing the toxicity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP regime). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive classical CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/ m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1 and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) or CHOP plus amifostine (6 cycles of amifostine 910 mg/m2 on day 1). Efficacy (time to progression, TTP; disease-free survival, DFS; overall survival, OS) and toxicity endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized to A-CHOP (n=18) or CHOP (n=16). Patients with A-CHOP vs CHOP had significantly lower toxicity; neutropenia grade 4 ocurred in 13/92 (13%) vs 23/85 (27%, P=0.007) cycles, febrile neutropenia in 3/92 A-CHOP (3%) vs 8/85 (10%, P=.056) CHOP cycles, hospitalization for toxicity in 4/92 (4%) A-CHOP vs 11/85 (13%, P=.05) CHOP cycles. Median hospitalization stay for toxicity was 5 days with A-CHOP vs 8 days with CHOP (P=.05). There were no significant differences at 8 years in TTP (A-CHOP, 48.9% vs CHOP, 36.3%; P=.65), DFS (A-CHOP, 72.9% vs CHOP 55.6%; P=.50) and OS (A-CHOP, 44.3% vs CHOP, 54.4%). There was no long-term toxicity of clinical interest. The only prognostic factor identified to 8 years was the International Prognostic Index (IPI low/low intermediate risk vs high intermediate/high risk; HR=2.98; CI 95%:1.01-8.77; P=.048). CONCLUSION: These results show that amifostine can be added to the standard CHOP treatment schedule with less acute toxicity and without influencing the outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-157
Number of pages6
JournalHematology/ Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addition of amifostine to the CHOP regimen in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A phase II trial showing reduction in toxicity without altering long-term survival'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this