Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria

  • Allison Golden
  • , Hannah C. Slater
  • , Ihn Kyung Jang
  • , Sayali Walke
  • , Thanh T. Phan
  • , Greg T. Bizilj
  • , Andrew Rashid
  • , Rebecca Barney
  • , Smita Das
  • , Melissa J. Rist
  • , James S. McCarthy
  • , Francois Nosten
  • , Jordi Landier
  • , Mallika Imwong
  • , Jennifer C.C. Hume
  • , Issaka Sagara
  • , Sara A. Healy
  • , Patrick E. Duffy
  • , Henry Ntuku
  • , Davis Mumbengegwi
  • Michelle S. Hsiang, Sean C. Murphy, John Rek, Katherine Torres, Dionicia Gamboa, Gonzalo J. Domingo
  • PATH Seattle
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
  • Department of Infectious Diseases
  • Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University
  • University of Oxford
  • Aix-Marseille Universités
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  • University of Science
  • University of California San Francisco Center for Tuberculosis
  • University of Namibia
  • University of Washington
  • Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Laboratory benchmarking allows objective analysis of the analytical performance of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). We present the analytical detection limits of the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH), the Rapigen BIOCREDIT Malaria Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII), and two best-in-class WHO-prequalified comparator RDTs, generated using standardized panels containing recombinant antigen, in vitro cultured parasites, international standards, and clinical samples. Detection limit antigen concentrations of HRP2, PfLDH, and PvLDH were determined for the Rapigen and comparator RDTs. Detection of antigens in international units (IU)/mL was also evaluated. The Rapigen Ag Pf (pLDH/HRPII) detected 3.9 and 3.9 IU/mL for PfLDH and HRP2, respectively, and the Ag Pf/Pv (pLDH/pLDH) detected 3.9 and 5.0 IU/mL for PfLDH and PvLDH, respectively. The comparator HRP2/PfLDH and HRP2/PvLDH detected 15.6 and 31.3 IU/mL for HRP2 and PfLDH and 15.6 and 50.0 IU/mL for HRP2 and PvLDH, respectively. The RDT clinical sensitivity was predicted through application of analytical detection limits to antigen concentration distributions from clinical symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. Febrile cases would be detected in a majority by both standard and Rapigen RDTs, but incremental increases in sensitivity in the Rapigen RDTs may be important for clinical cases currently missed by microscopy. Rapigen RDTs were predicted to have improved detection of asymptomatic cases and infections with parasites carrying hrp2 deletions through more sensitive PfLDH detection. Through the benchmarking and simulation of clinical sensitivity, a method for rapidly assessing the ability of new RDTs to meet clinical needs using high-sensitivity antigen distribution data is presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)956-966
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume111
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analytical Sensitivity Analysis and Clinical Impact Modeling of Rapigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this