Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association of vision impairment and blindness with socioeconomic status in adults 50 years and older from Alto Amazonas, Peru

  • John M. Nesemann
  • , Noelia Morocho-Alburqueque
  • , Alvaro Quincho-Lopez
  • , Marleny Muñoz
  • , Sandra Liliana-Talero
  • , Emma M. Harding-Esch
  • , Martha Idalí Saboyá-Díaz
  • , Harvy A. Honorio-Morales
  • , Salomón Durand
  • , Cristiam A. Carey-Angeles
  • , Jeffrey D. Klausner
  • , Andres G. Lescano
  • , Jeremy D. Keenan
  • University of California San Francisco Center for Tuberculosis
  • University of California
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Universidad Nacional de Piura
  • Univ. Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
  • Área de Epidemiología
  • Escuela Superior de Oftalmología del Instituto Barraquer de América
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • Ministry of Health of Peru
  • Área de Epidemiología
  • Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana
  • Keck School of Medicine of USC
  • University of California San Francisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and visual impairment (VI) or blindness in the rural Peruvian Amazon, hypothesizing that higher SES would have a protective effect on the odds of VI or blindness. Methods: In this cross-sectional study of 16 rural communities in the Peruvian Amazon, consenting adults aged ≥ 50 years were recruited from ~30 randomly selected households per village. Each household was administered a questionnaire and had a SES score constructed using principal components analysis. Blindness and VI were determined using a ministry of health 3-meter visual acuity card. Results: Overall, 207 adults aged ≥ 50 were eligible; 146 (70.5%) completed visual acuity screening and answered the questionnaire. Of those 146 participants who completed presenting visual acuity screening, 57 (39.0%, 95% CI 30.2–47.1) were classified as visually impaired and 6 (4.1%, 95% CI 0.9–7.3) as blind. Belonging to the highest SES tercile had a protective effect on VI or blindness (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.91, p = 0.034), with a linear trend across decreasing levels of SES (p = 0.019). This observed effect remained significant regardless of how SES groups were assigned. Conclusion: Belonging to a higher SES group resulted in a lower odds of VI or blindness compared to those in the lowest SES group. The observation of a dose response provides confidence in the observed association, but causality remains unclear. Blindness prevention programs could maximize impact by designing activities that specifically target people with lower SES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-439
Number of pages6
JournalEye (Basingstoke)
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of vision impairment and blindness with socioeconomic status in adults 50 years and older from Alto Amazonas, Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this