Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Climate change and public health in South America: a scoping review of governance and public engagement research

  • Bruno Takahashi
  • , Carolina Gil Posse
  • , Milena Sergeeva
  • , María Fernanda Salas
  • , Sydney Wojczynski
  • , Stella Hartinger
  • , Marisol Yglesias-González
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Buenos Aires
  • Global Climate and Health Alliance
  • University of Costa Rica
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This scoping review examines peer-reviewed literature of governance and public engagement at the intersection of public health and climate change in South America. The review shows significant gaps in academic publications, particularly because health was mostly a secondary theme examined in the studies. The few studies about governmental interventions (e.g., policies and programs) suggest that these have not been effective. Regarding public engagement, no studies examined social media engagement with health and climate change, and only one examined news coverage. Finally, most articles focused primarily on individual countries, with few comparative or regional analyses of South America. Strategic action addressing climate change and its effects on public health needs to be based on empirical evidence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100603
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Volume26
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Governance
  • Public engagement
  • Public health
  • Scoping review
  • South America

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climate change and public health in South America: a scoping review of governance and public engagement research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this