Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

  • Joseph A. Sparano
  • , Robert J. Gray
  • , Peter M. Ravdin
  • , Della F. Makower
  • , Kathleen I. Pritchard
  • , Kathy S. Albain
  • , Daniel F. Hayes
  • , Charles E. Geyer
  • , Elizabeth C. Dees
  • , Matthew P. Goetz
  • , John A. Olson
  • , Tracy Lively
  • , Sunil S. Badve
  • , Thomas J. Saphner
  • , Lynne I. Wagner
  • , Timothy J. Whelan
  • , Matthew J. Ellis
  • , Soonmyung Paik
  • , William C. Wood
  • , Maccon M. Keane
  • Henry L. Gomez Moreno, Pavan S. Reddy, Timothy F. Goggins, Ingrid A. Mayer, Adam M. Brufsky, Deborah L. Toppmeyer, Virginia G. Kaklamani, Jeffrey L. Berenberg, Jeffrey Abrams, George W. Sledge
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of Texas at San Antonio
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Sunnybrook Research Institute
  • Loyola University Medical Center
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • McMaster University
  • Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic
  • Northwestern University
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast
  • Emory University
  • Cancer Trials Ireland
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Eduardo Cáceres Graziani
  • Cancer Center of Kansas
  • Fox Valley Hematology and Oncology
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

470 Scopus citations

Abstract

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer may be guided by clinicopathological factors and a score based on a 21-gene assay to determine the risk of recurrence. Whether the level of clinical risk of breast cancer recurrence adds prognostic information to the recurrence score is not known. METHODS We performed a prospective trial involving 9427 women with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer, in whom an assay of 21 genes had been performed, and we classified the clinical risk of recurrence of breast cancer as low or high on the basis of the tumor size and histologic grade. The effect of clinical risk was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios for distant recurrence with the use of Cox proportional-hazards models. The initial endocrine therapy was tamoxifen alone in the majority of the premenopausal women who were 50 years of age or younger. RESULTS The level of clinical risk was prognostic of distant recurrence in women with an intermediate 21-gene recurrence score of 11 to 25 (on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis or a greater potential benefit from chemotherapy) who were randomly assigned to endocrine therapy (hazard ratio for the comparison of high vs. low clinical risk, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93 to 3.87) or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.66 to 3.48) and in women with a high recurrence score (a score of 26 to 100), all of whom were assigned to chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.94 to 5.19). Among women who were 50 years of age or younger who had received endocrine therapy alone, the estimated (±SE) rate of distant recurrence at 9 years was less than 5% (≤1.8±0.9%) with a low recurrence score (a score of 0 to 10), irrespective of clinical risk, and 4.7±1.0% with an intermediate recurrence score and low clinical risk. In this age group, the estimated distant recurrence at 9 years exceeded 10% among women with a high clinical risk and an intermediate recurrence score who received endocrine therapy alone (12.3±2.4%) and among those with a high recurrence score who received chemoendocrine therapy (15.2±3.3%). CONCLUSIONS Clinical-risk stratification provided prognostic information that, when added to the 21-gene recurrence score, could be used to identify premenopausal women who could benefit from more effective therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2395-2405
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume380
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical and genomic risk to guide the use of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this