Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Brooke Levis; Dean McMillan; Ying Sun; Chen He; Danielle B. Rice; Ankur Krishnan; Yin Wu; Marleine Azar; Tatiana A. Sanchez; Matthew J. Chiovitti; Parash Mani Bhandari; Dipika Neupane; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E. Riehm; Mahrukh Imran; Jill T. Boruff; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P.A. Ioannidis; Lorie A. Kloda; Scott B. Patten; Ian Shrier; Roy C. Ziegelstein; Liane Comeau; Nicholas D. Mitchell; Marcello Tonelli; Simone N. Vigod; Franca Aceti; Rubén Alvarado; Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel; Muideen O. Bakare; Jacqueline Barnes; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Carola Bindt; Philip M. Boyce; Adomas Bunevicius; Tiago Castro e. Couto; Linda H. Chaudron; Humberto Correa; Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo; Valsamma Eapen; Michelle Fernandes; Barbara Figueiredo; Jane R.W. Fisher; Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve; Lisa Giardinelli; Nadine Helle; Louise M. Howard; Dina Sami Khalifa; Jane Kohlhoff; Laima Kusminskas; Zoltán Kozinszky; Lorenzo Lelli; Angeliki A. Leonardou; Beth A. Lewis; Michael Maes; Valentina Meuti; Sandra Nakić Radoš; Purificación Navarro García; Daisuke Nishi; Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono; Emma Robertson-Blackmore; Tamsen J. Rochat; Heather J. Rowe; Bonnie W.M. Siu; Alkistis Skalkidou; Alan Stein; Robert C. Stewart; Kuan Pin Su; Inger Sundström-Poromaa; Meri Tadinac; S. Darius Tandon; Iva Tendais; Pavaani Thiagayson; Annamária Töreki; Anna Torres-Giménez; Thach D. Tran; Kylee Trevillion; Katherine Turner; Johann M. Vega-Dienstmaier; Karen Wynter; Kimberly A. Yonkers; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D. Thombs

doi:10.1002/mpr.1803

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Brooke Levis
, Dean McMillan
, Ying Sun
, Chen He
, Danielle B. Rice
, Ankur Krishnan
, Yin Wu
, Marleine Azar
, Tatiana A. Sanchez
, Matthew J. Chiovitti
, Parash Mani Bhandari
, Dipika Neupane
, Nazanin Saadat
, Kira E. Riehm
, Mahrukh Imran
, Jill T. Boruff
, Pim Cuijpers
, Simon Gilbody
, John P.A. Ioannidis
, Lorie A. Kloda

Scott B. Patten, Ian Shrier, Roy C. Ziegelstein, Liane Comeau, Nicholas D. Mitchell, Marcello Tonelli, Simone N. Vigod, Franca Aceti, Rubén Alvarado, Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel, Muideen O. Bakare, Jacqueline Barnes, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Carola Bindt, Philip M. Boyce, Adomas Bunevicius, Tiago Castro e. Couto, Linda H. Chaudron, Humberto Correa, Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Valsamma Eapen, Michelle Fernandes, Barbara Figueiredo, Jane R.W. Fisher, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve, Lisa Giardinelli, Nadine Helle, Louise M. Howard, Dina Sami Khalifa, Jane Kohlhoff, Laima Kusminskas, Zoltán Kozinszky, Lorenzo Lelli, Angeliki A. Leonardou, Beth A. Lewis, Michael Maes, Valentina Meuti, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Purificación Navarro García, Daisuke Nishi, Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Emma Robertson-Blackmore, Tamsen J. Rochat, Heather J. Rowe, Bonnie W.M. Siu, Alkistis Skalkidou, Alan Stein, Robert C. Stewart, Kuan Pin Su, Inger Sundström-Poromaa, Meri Tadinac, S. Darius Tandon, Iva Tendais, Pavaani Thiagayson, Annamária Töreki, Anna Torres-Giménez, Thach D. Tran, Kylee Trevillion, Katherine Turner, Johann M. Vega-Dienstmaier, Karen Wynter, Kimberly A. Yonkers, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D. Thombs

Jewish General Hospital
McGill University
University of York
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
University of Amsterdam
Stanford University
Concordia University
University of Calgary
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Universite de Montreal
University of Alberta
Alberta Health Services
University of Calgary
University of Toronto
Sapienza University of Rome
Fundación Arriaran–Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Chile
Facultad de Medicina y Nutrición
Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital
Childhood Neuropsychiatric Disorders Initiatives (CNDI)
Birkbeck, University of London
School of Nursing
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
University of Sydney
Westmead Hospital
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Federal University of Minas Gerais
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry
University of São Paulo
University of New South Wales
Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research
University of Southampton and Southampton Children's Hospital
University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
University of Minho
Monash University
Hospital Clinic
Centre of Epidemiological Studies of HIV/AIDS and STI of Catalonia (CEEISCAT)
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi Sunyer (IDIBAPS)
University of Florence
King’s College London
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Ahfad University for Women
University of Oslo
Hospital for Sick Kids
Karitane
Private Practice
Blekinge Hospital
Athens University Medical School
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Chulalongkorn University
Deakin University
Catholic University of Croatia
Psychology Service
Graduate School of Medicine
National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
Faculté de Médecine de l'université de Kinshasa
Halifax Health
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa
Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong
Uppsala University
University of Oxford
University of Malawi
University of Edinburgh
China Medical University College of Medicine
China Medical University Hospital
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Institute of Mental Health
KK Women's And Children's Hospital
National Healthcare Group Pte Ltd
MTA-SZTE “Lendület” Mycobiome Research Group
San Paolo Hospital
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado
Yale University School of Medicine
Yale University
McGill University Health Centre

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

Original language	English
Article number	e1803
Journal	International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume	28
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803
State	Published - 1 Dec 2019
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
depressive disorders
diagnostic interviews
individual participant data meta-analysis
major depression

Access to Document

10.1002/mpr.1803

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Levis, B., McMillan, D., Sun, Y., He, C., Rice, D. B., Krishnan, A., Wu, Y., Azar, M., Sanchez, T. A., Chiovitti, M. J., Bhandari, P. M., Neupane, D., Saadat, N., Riehm, K. E., Imran, M., Boruff, J. T., Cuijpers, P., Gilbody, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., ... Thombs, B. D. (2019). Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28(4), Article e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

@article{2b7fcfb1cafd4f4bb4252583f8805a86,

title = "Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis",

abstract = "Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95\% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95\% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95\% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.",

keywords = "Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, depressive disorders, diagnostic interviews, individual participant data meta-analysis, major depression",

author = "Brooke Levis and Dean McMillan and Ying Sun and Chen He and Rice, \{Danielle B.\} and Ankur Krishnan and Yin Wu and Marleine Azar and Sanchez, \{Tatiana A.\} and Chiovitti, \{Matthew J.\} and Bhandari, \{Parash Mani\} and Dipika Neupane and Nazanin Saadat and Riehm, \{Kira E.\} and Mahrukh Imran and Boruff, \{Jill T.\} and Pim Cuijpers and Simon Gilbody and Ioannidis, \{John P.A.\} and Kloda, \{Lorie A.\} and Patten, \{Scott B.\} and Ian Shrier and Ziegelstein, \{Roy C.\} and Liane Comeau and Mitchell, \{Nicholas D.\} and Marcello Tonelli and Vigod, \{Simone N.\} and Franca Aceti and Rub{\'e}n Alvarado and Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel and Bakare, \{Muideen O.\} and Jacqueline Barnes and Beck, \{Cheryl Tatano\} and Carola Bindt and Boyce, \{Philip M.\} and Adomas Bunevicius and Couto, \{Tiago Castro e.\} and Chaudron, \{Linda H.\} and Humberto Correa and \{de Figueiredo\}, \{Felipe Pinheiro\} and Valsamma Eapen and Michelle Fernandes and Barbara Figueiredo and Fisher, \{Jane R.W.\} and Llu{\"i}sa Garcia-Esteve and Lisa Giardinelli and Nadine Helle and Howard, \{Louise M.\} and Khalifa, \{Dina Sami\} and Jane Kohlhoff and Laima Kusminskas and Zolt{\'a}n Kozinszky and Lorenzo Lelli and Leonardou, \{Angeliki A.\} and Lewis, \{Beth A.\} and Michael Maes and Valentina Meuti and \{Naki{\'c} Rado{\v s}\}, Sandra and \{Navarro Garc{\'i}a\}, Purificaci{\'o}n and Daisuke Nishi and \{Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono\}, Daniel and Emma Robertson-Blackmore and Rochat, \{Tamsen J.\} and Rowe, \{Heather J.\} and Siu, \{Bonnie W.M.\} and Alkistis Skalkidou and Alan Stein and Stewart, \{Robert C.\} and Su, \{Kuan Pin\} and Inger Sundstr{\"o}m-Poromaa and Meri Tadinac and Tandon, \{S. Darius\} and Iva Tendais and Pavaani Thiagayson and Annam{\'a}ria T{\"o}reki and Anna Torres-Gim{\'e}nez and Tran, \{Thach D.\} and Kylee Trevillion and Katherine Turner and Vega-Dienstmaier, \{Johann M.\} and Karen Wynter and Yonkers, \{Kimberly A.\} and Andrea Benedetti and Thombs, \{Brett D.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley \& Sons Ltd",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/mpr.1803",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "28",

journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",

issn = "1049-8931",

number = "4",

}

Levis, B, McMillan, D, Sun, Y, He, C, Rice, DB, Krishnan, A, Wu, Y, Azar, M, Sanchez, TA, Chiovitti, MJ, Bhandari, PM, Neupane, D, Saadat, N, Riehm, KE, Imran, M, Boruff, JT, Cuijpers, P, Gilbody, S, Ioannidis, JPA, Kloda, LA, Patten, SB, Shrier, I, Ziegelstein, RC, Comeau, L, Mitchell, ND, Tonelli, M, Vigod, SN, Aceti, F, Alvarado, R, Alvarado-Esquivel, C, Bakare, MO, Barnes, J, Beck, CT, Bindt, C, Boyce, PM, Bunevicius, A, Couto, TCE, Chaudron, LH, Correa, H, de Figueiredo, FP, Eapen, V, Fernandes, M, Figueiredo, B, Fisher, JRW, Garcia-Esteve, L, Giardinelli, L, Helle, N, Howard, LM, Khalifa, DS, Kohlhoff, J, Kusminskas, L, Kozinszky, Z, Lelli, L, Leonardou, AA, Lewis, BA, Maes, M, Meuti, V, Nakić Radoš, S, Navarro García, P, Nishi, D, Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, D, Robertson-Blackmore, E, Rochat, TJ, Rowe, HJ, Siu, BWM, Skalkidou, A, Stein, A, Stewart, RC, Su, KP, Sundström-Poromaa, I, Tadinac, M, Tandon, SD, Tendais, I, Thiagayson, P, Töreki, A, Torres-Giménez, A, Tran, TD, Trevillion, K, Turner, K, Vega-Dienstmaier, JM, Wynter, K, Yonkers, KA, Benedetti, A & Thombs, BD 2019, 'Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis', International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, vol. 28, no. 4, e1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1803

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis. / Levis, Brooke; McMillan, Dean; Sun, Ying et al.
In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, e1803, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum

T2 - An individual participant data meta-analysis

AU - Levis, Brooke

AU - McMillan, Dean

AU - Sun, Ying

AU - He, Chen

AU - Rice, Danielle B.

AU - Krishnan, Ankur

AU - Wu, Yin

AU - Azar, Marleine

AU - Sanchez, Tatiana A.

AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.

AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani

AU - Neupane, Dipika

AU - Saadat, Nazanin

AU - Riehm, Kira E.

AU - Imran, Mahrukh

AU - Boruff, Jill T.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Gilbody, Simon

AU - Ioannidis, John P.A.

AU - Kloda, Lorie A.

AU - Patten, Scott B.

AU - Shrier, Ian

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.

AU - Comeau, Liane

AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D.

AU - Tonelli, Marcello

AU - Vigod, Simone N.

AU - Aceti, Franca

AU - Alvarado, Rubén

AU - Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme

AU - Bakare, Muideen O.

AU - Barnes, Jacqueline

AU - Beck, Cheryl Tatano

AU - Bindt, Carola

AU - Boyce, Philip M.

AU - Bunevicius, Adomas

AU - Couto, Tiago Castro e.

AU - Chaudron, Linda H.

AU - Correa, Humberto

AU - de Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro

AU - Eapen, Valsamma

AU - Fernandes, Michelle

AU - Figueiredo, Barbara

AU - Fisher, Jane R.W.

AU - Garcia-Esteve, Lluïsa

AU - Giardinelli, Lisa

AU - Helle, Nadine

AU - Howard, Louise M.

AU - Khalifa, Dina Sami

AU - Kohlhoff, Jane

AU - Kusminskas, Laima

AU - Kozinszky, Zoltán

AU - Lelli, Lorenzo

AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A.

AU - Lewis, Beth A.

AU - Maes, Michael

AU - Meuti, Valentina

AU - Nakić Radoš, Sandra

AU - Navarro García, Purificación

AU - Nishi, Daisuke

AU - Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel

AU - Robertson-Blackmore, Emma

AU - Rochat, Tamsen J.

AU - Rowe, Heather J.

AU - Siu, Bonnie W.M.

AU - Skalkidou, Alkistis

AU - Stein, Alan

AU - Stewart, Robert C.

AU - Su, Kuan Pin

AU - Sundström-Poromaa, Inger

AU - Tadinac, Meri

AU - Tandon, S. Darius

AU - Tendais, Iva

AU - Thiagayson, Pavaani

AU - Töreki, Annamária

AU - Torres-Giménez, Anna

AU - Tran, Thach D.

AU - Trevillion, Kylee

AU - Turner, Katherine

AU - Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M.

AU - Wynter, Karen

AU - Yonkers, Kimberly A.

AU - Benedetti, Andrea

AU - Thombs, Brett D.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

AB - Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

KW - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

KW - depressive disorders

KW - diagnostic interviews

KW - individual participant data meta-analysis

KW - major depression

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85073948478

U2 - 10.1002/mpr.1803

DO - 10.1002/mpr.1803

M3 - Artículo

C2 - 31568624

AN - SCOPUS:85073948478

SN - 1049-8931

VL - 28

JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

IS - 4

M1 - e1803

ER -

Levis B, McMillan D, Sun Y, He C, Rice DB, Krishnan A et al. Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2019 Dec 1;28(4):e1803. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1803

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this