Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Drawing the line between adaptation and development: a systematic literature review of planned adaptation in developing countries

  • Mya Sherman
  • , Lea Berrang-Ford
  • , Shuaib Lwasa
  • , James Ford
  • , Didacus B. Namanya
  • , Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas
  • , Michelle Maillet
  • , Sherilee Harper
  • , R. Ihacc
  • McGill University
  • Makerere University
  • Ministry of Health
  • University of Guelph
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

Climate change adaptation is increasingly considered an urgent priority for policy action. Billions of dollars have been pledged for adaptation finance, with many donor agencies requiring that adaptation is distinct from baseline development. However, practitioners and academics continue to question what adaptation looks like on the ground, especially in a developing country. This study examines the current framing of planned adaptation amidst low socioeconomic development and considers the practical implications of this framing for adaptation planning. Three overarching approaches to planned adaptation in a developing country context emerged in a systematic review of 30 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2015, including: (1) technocratic risk management, which treats adaptation as additional to development, (2) pro-poor vulnerability reduction, which acknowledges the ability of conventional development to foster and act as adaptation, and (3) sustainable adaptation, which suggests that adaptation should only be integrated into a type of development that is socially and environmentally sustainable. Over half of ‘sustainable adaptation’ articles in this review took a critical adaptation approach, drawing primarily from political ecology and postdevelopment studies, and emphasizing the malleability of adaptation. The reviewed articles highlight how the different framings of the relationship between adaptation and development result in diverse and sometimes contradictory messages regarding adaptation design, implementation, funding, monitoring, and evaluation. This review illustrates the need to continually interrogate the multiple framings of adaptation and development and to foster a pragmatic and pluralistic dialogue regarding planned adaptation and transformative change in developing countries. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:707–726. doi: 10.1002/wcc.416. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-726
Number of pages20
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drawing the line between adaptation and development: a systematic literature review of planned adaptation in developing countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this