Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Facilitated molecular typing of shigella isolates using ERIC-PCR

  • Margaret Kosek
  • , Pablo Peñataro Yori
  • , Robert H. Gilman
  • , Henry Vela
  • , Maribel Paredes Olortegui
  • , Cesar Banda Chavez
  • , Maritza Calderon
  • , Juan Perez Bao
  • , Eric Hall
  • , Ryan Maves
  • , Rosa Burga
  • , Graciela Meza Sanchez
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Hospital Regional
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Asociación Benéfica PRISMA
  • NAMRID-Unit 3800
  • Ministry of Health of Peru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) typing versus the current standard for the typing of Shigella pulsed gel electrophoresis (PFGE), we typed 116 Shigella isolates from a village in an endemic setting over a 20-month period using both methods. PFGE identified 37 pulse types and had a discrimination index of 0.925 (95% confidence interval = 0.830-1.00), whereas ERIC-PCR identified 42 types and had a discrimination index of 0.961 (95% confidence interval = 0.886-1.00). PFGE and ERIC-PCR showed a 90.4% correlation in the designation of isolates as clonal or non-clonal in pairwise comparisons. Both systems were highly reproducible and provided highly similar and supplementary data compared with serotyping regarding the transmission dynamics of shigellosis in this community. ERIC-PCR is considerably more rapid and inexpensive than PFGE and may have a complementary role to PFGE for initial investigations of hypothesized outbreaks in resource-limited settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1018-1025
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Facilitated molecular typing of shigella isolates using ERIC-PCR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this