Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Financing maternal health and family planning: Are we on the right track? Evidence from the reproductive health subaccounts in Mexico, 2003-2012

  • Leticia Avila-Burgos
  • , Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado
  • , Julio Montañez-Hernandez
  • , Edson Servan-Mori
  • , Belkis Aracena-Genao
  • , Aurora Del Río-Zolezzi
  • National Institute of Public Health
  • Ministry of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To analyze whether the changes observed in the level and distribution of resources for maternal health and family planning (MHFP) programs from 2003 to 2012 were consistent with the financial goals of the related policies. Materials and Methods: A longitudinal descriptive analysis of the Mexican Reproductive Health Subaccounts 2003-2012 was performed by financing scheme and health function. Financing schemes included social security, government schemes, household out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, and private insurance plans. Functions were preventive care, including family planning, antenatal and puerperium health services, normal and cesarean deliveries, and treatment of complications. Changes in the financial imbalance indicators covered by MHFP policy were tracked: (a) public and OOP expenditures as percentages of total MHFP spending; (b) public expenditure per woman of reproductive age (WoRA, 15-49 years) by financing scheme; (c) public expenditure on treating complications as a percentage of preventive care; and (d) public expenditure on WoRA at state level. Statistical analyses of trends and distributions were performed. Results: Public expenditure on government schemes grew by approximately 300%, and the financial imbalance between populations covered by social security and government schemes decreased. The financial burden on households declined, particularly among households without social security. Expenditure on preventive care grew by 16%, narrowing the financing gap between treatment of complications and preventive care. Finally, public expenditure per WoRA for government schemes nearly doubled at the state level, although considerable disparities persist. Conclusions: Changes in the level and distribution of MHFP funding from 2003 to 2012 were consistent with the relevant policy goals. However, improving efficiency requires further analysis to ascertain the impact of investments on health outcomes. This, in turn, will require better financial data systems as a precondition for improving the monitoring and accountability functions in Mexico.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0147923
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Financing maternal health and family planning: Are we on the right track? Evidence from the reproductive health subaccounts in Mexico, 2003-2012'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this