Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Global health, global surgery and mass casualties. I. Rationale for integrated mass casualty centres

  • Tariq Khan
  • , Leonidas Quintana
  • , Sergio Aguilera
  • , Roxanna Garcia
  • , Haitham Shoman
  • , Luke Caddell
  • , Rifat Latifi
  • , Kee B. Park
  • , Patricia Garcia
  • , Robert Dempsey
  • , Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld
  • , Corey Scurlock
  • , Nigel Crisp
  • , Lubna Samad
  • , Montray Smith
  • , Laura Lippa
  • , Rashid Jooma
  • , Russell J. Andrews
  • Neurotrauma Committee
  • Northwest General Hospital and Research Centre
  • Universidad de Valparaíso
  • World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
  • Valparaiso University Hospital
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
  • Harvard Medical School
  • New York Medical College
  • International Virtual EHospital Foundation
  • Minister of Health
  • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
  • Foundation for International Education in Neurological Surgery
  • The Alfred
  • Royal Australian Army Medical Corps
  • Westchester Medical Center
  • House of Lords Parliamentary Group on Global Health
  • Nursing Department
  • Indus Health Network
  • University of Louisville School of Nursing
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
  • Aga Khan University
  • Government of Pakistan
  • NASA Ames Research Center

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

It has been well-documented recently that 5 billion people globally lack surgical care. Also well-documented is the need to improve mass casualty disaster response. Many of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for 2030 - healthcare and economic milestones - require significant improvement in global surgical care, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Trauma/stroke centres evolved in high-income countries with evidence that 24/7/365 surgical and critical care markedly improved morbidity and mortality for trauma and stroke and for cardiovascular events, difficult childbirth, acute abdomen. Duplication of emergency services, especially civilian and military, often results in suboptimal, expensive care. By combining all healthcare resources within the ongoing healthcare system, more efficient care for both individual emergencies and mass casualty situations can be achieved. We describe progress in establishing mass casualty centres in Chile and Pakistan. In both locations, planning among the stakeholders (primarily civilian and military) indicates the feasibility of such integrated surgical and emergency care. We also review other programmes and initiatives to provide integrated mass casualty disaster response. Integrated mass casualty centres are a feasible means to improve both day-to-day surgical care and mass casualty disaster response. The humanitarian aspect of mass casualty disasters facilitates integration among stakeholders - from local healthcare systems to military resources to international healthcare organisations. The benefits of mass casualty centres - both healthcare and economic - can facilitate achieving the 2030 UN SDGs.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere001943
JournalBMJ Global Health
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Dec 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • health economics
  • health policy
  • injury
  • surgery
  • traumatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global health, global surgery and mass casualties. I. Rationale for integrated mass casualty centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this