Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy

  • Halle C.F. Moore
  • , Joseph M. Unger
  • , Kelly Anne Phillips
  • , Frances Boyle
  • , Erika Hitre
  • , David Porter
  • , Prudence A. Francis
  • , Lori J. Goldstein
  • , Henry L. Gomez
  • , Carlos S. Vallejos
  • , Ann H. Partridge
  • , Shaker R. Dakhil
  • , Agustin A. Garcia
  • , Julie Gralow
  • , Janine M. Lombard
  • , John F. Forbes
  • , Silvana Martino
  • , William E. Barlow
  • , Carol J. Fabian
  • , Lori Minasian
  • Frank L. Meyskens, Richard D. Gelber, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kathy S. Albain
  • Taussig Cancer Institute
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Melbourne
  • Breast Cancer Trials (Australia New Zealand)
  • International Breast Cancer Study Group
  • Calvary Mater Hospital
  • University of Sydney
  • National Institute of Oncology
  • Auckland Regional Cancer and Blood Service
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Eduardo Cáceres Graziani
  • AUNA
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program
  • University of Southern California Norris Cancer Center
  • University of Washington
  • Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
  • University of Kansas
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • University of California at Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • IBCSG Statistical Center
  • The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Loyola University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

530 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ovarian failure is a common toxic effect of chemotherapy. Studies of the use of gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to protect ovarian function have shown mixed results and lack data on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS We randomly assigned 257 premenopausal women with operable hormone-receptor- negative breast cancer to receive standard chemotherapy with the GnRH agonist goserelin (goserelin group) or standard chemotherapy without goserelin (chemotherapy- alone group). The primary study end point was the rate of ovarian failure at 2 years, with ovarian failure defined as the absence of menses in the preceding 6 months and levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the postmenopausal range. Rates were compared with the use of conditional logistic regression. Secondary end points included pregnancy outcomes and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS At baseline, 218 patients were eligible and could be evaluated. Among 135 with complete primary end-point data, the ovarian failure rate was 8% in the goserelin group and 22% in the chemotherapy-alone group (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.97; two-sided P = 0.04). Owing to missing primary end-point data, sensitivity analyses were performed, and the results were consistent with the main findings. Missing data did not differ according to treatment group or according to the stratification factors of age and planned chemotherapy regimen. Among the 218 patients who could be evaluated, pregnancy occurred in more women in the goserelin group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (21% vs. 11%, P = 0.03); women in the goserelin group also had improved disease-free survival (P = 0.04) and overall survival (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Although missing data weaken interpretation of the findings, administration of goserelin with chemotherapy appeared to protect against ovarian failure, reducing the risk of early menopause and improving prospects for fertility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)923-932
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume372
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Goserelin for ovarian protection during breast-cancer adjuvant chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this