Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Health-care provider compliance with a revised Plasmodium vivax radical cure algorithm incorporating tafenoquine and quantitative G6PD testing in the Peruvian Amazon: a prospective observational study

  • Elisa Vidal-Cardenas
  • , Catharine I. De Freitas-Vidal
  • , Veronica Soto-Calle
  • , Hugo Rodríguez-Ferrucci
  • , Wilma Casanova
  • , Ivan Condori-Lizarraga
  • , Stephan Duparc
  • , Elodie Jambert
  • , Melanie Larson
  • , Heike Huegel
  • , Thy Do
  • , Paula Alejandra Burela
  • , Marcus Lacerda
  • , Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas
  • MMV Medicines for Malaria Venture
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt
  • Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana
  • Fiocruz Amazônia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Plasmodium vivax relapse remains a key barrier to malaria elimination in Latin America. Historically, radical cure relied on multi-day primaquine regimens, often without prior glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing. In November 2024, WHO issued a recommendation specific to South America for radical cure with primaquine or single-dose tafenoquine after testing G6PD activity. We assessed the operational feasibility of implementing this revised radical cure algorithm, integrating point-of-care quantitative G6PD testing to guide primaquine or tafenoquine selection, under routine care, measured by health-care provider (HCP) compliance. Methods: This prospective, observational study in Loreto, Peru (Aug 2022–Dec 2024) evaluated implementation of a revised radical cure algorithm among patients by trained routine HCPs across 14 health facilities. HCP compliance was assessed from the provider (correct algorithm application in ≥80% of patients per HCP role) and patient perspectives (proportion correctly treated per algorithm). Safety endpoints included acute haemolytic anaemia (AHA) and other serious adverse events. Findings: Among 187 HCPs and 987 patients, HCP compliance was 96.6% (172/178) from the provider perspective and 98.7% (974/987) from the patient perspective, with similar results across urban/periurban and remote/rural facilities. Incorrect treatments (1.3%; 13/987) were mostly due to operational lapses in treatment sequencing and eligibility among G6PD-normal individuals. Ten patients (1.1%; 10/916) developed symptoms suggestive of AHA; one met suspected AHA criteria, unconfirmed. Eight patients (0.8%; 8/986) experienced serious adverse events attributable to severe malaria; all recovered. Interpretation: HCPs across participating facilities achieved high compliance with the revised radical cure algorithm from both perspectives and consistently across urban/periurban and remote/rural settings. Incorrect treatments were infrequent and no AHA was confirmed. These findings demonstrate that HCP at the participating facilities can successfully implement the revised radical cure algorithm, contributing to the operational evidence base informing its scale-up in Peru and the Americas. Funding: Unitaid (Grant number 2021-43-VIV).

Original languageEnglish
Article number101568
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Volume62
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Compliance
  • G6PD testing
  • Health care provider
  • Health systems
  • Implementation science
  • Latin America
  • Malaria
  • Malaria elimination
  • Malaria treatment guidelines
  • Mixed-methods research
  • Operational research
  • Peru
  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Point-of-care diagnostics
  • Provider behaviour
  • Radical cure
  • Real-world evidence
  • Tafenoquine
  • Treatment uptake

Cite this