Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lessons learned from over a decade of data audits in international observational HIV cohorts in Latin America and East Africa

  • Sarah C. Lotspeich
  • , Bryan E. Shepherd
  • , Marion Achieng Kariuki
  • , Kara Wools-Kaloustian
  • , Catherine C. McGowan
  • , Beverly Musick
  • , Aggrey Semeere
  • , Brenda E. Crabtree Ramírez
  • , Denna M. Mkwashapi
  • , Carina Cesar
  • , Matthew Ssemakadde
  • , Daisy Maria Machado
  • , Antony Ngeresa
  • , Flávia Faleiro Ferreira
  • , Jerome Lwali
  • , Adias Marcelin
  • , Sandra Wagner Cardoso
  • , Marco Tulio Luque
  • , Larissa Otero
  • , Claudia P. Cortés
  • Stephany N. Duda
  • Wake Forest University
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Makerere University
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • National Institute of Geriatrics
  • National Institute for Medical Research Tanga
  • Fundación Huesped
  • Masaka Regional Referral Hospital
  • Federal University of São Paulo
  • United States Agency for International Development Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare
  • Federal University of Minas Gerais
  • Tumbi Hospital HIV Care and Treatment Clinic
  • Groupe Haïtien d'Etude du Sarcome de Kaposi et des Infections Opportunistes
  • Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI)
  • Instituto Hondureno de Seguridad Social and Hospital Escuela
  • Fundación Arriarán

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Routine patient care data are increasingly used for biomedical research, but such secondary use data have known limitations, including their quality. When leveraging routine care data for observational research, developing audit protocols that can maximize informational return and minimize costs is paramount. Methods: For more than a decade, the Latin America and East Africa regions of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium have been auditing the observational data drawn from participating human immunodeficiency virus clinics. Since our earliest audits, where external auditors used paper forms to record audit findings from paper medical records, we have streamlined our protocols to obtain more efficient and informative audits that keep up with advancing technology while reducing travel obligations and associated costs. Results: We present five key lessons learned from conducting data audits of secondary-use data from resource-limited settings for more than 10 years and share eight recommendations for other consortia looking to implement data quality initiatives. Conclusion: After completing multiple audit cycles in both the Latin America and East Africa regions of the IeDEA consortium, we have established a rich reference for data quality in our cohorts, as well as large, audited analytical datasets that can be used to answer important clinical questions with confidence. By sharing our audit processes and how they have been adapted over time, we hope that others can develop protocols informed by our lessons learned from more than a decade of experience in these large, diverse cohorts.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere245
JournalJournal of Clinical and Translational Science
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Nov 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Data audits
  • HIV
  • LMIC
  • data quality
  • international research
  • observational cohorts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons learned from over a decade of data audits in international observational HIV cohorts in Latin America and East Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this