Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer Trials (USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 [NRG Oncology])

  • Charles E. Geyer
  • , Joanne L. Blum
  • , Greg Yothers
  • , Lina Asmar
  • , Patrick J. Flynn
  • , Nicholas J. Robert
  • , Judith O. Hopkins
  • , Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy
  • , Priya Rastogi
  • , Shannon L. Puhalla
  • , Christie J. Hilton
  • , Chau T. Dang
  • , Henry Leonidas Gómez
  • , Svetislava J. Vukelja
  • , Alan P. Lyss
  • , Devchand Paul
  • , Adam M. Brufsky
  • , Linda H. Colangelo
  • , Sandra M. Swain
  • , Eleftherios P. Mamounas
  • Norman Wolmark
  • NSABP Pathology Office
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Texas Oncology
  • University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
  • McKesson Specialty Health
  • Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium (MSORC)
  • Ontada
  • Ncorp
  • Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Allegheny Health Network
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Eduardo Cáceres Graziani
  • US Oncology-Texas Oncology
  • Program at Missouri Baptist Cancer Center
  • Georgetown University
  • UF Cancer Center at Orlando Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The primary joint efficacy analysis of the Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer (ABC) trials reported in 2017 failed to demonstrate nonanthracycline adjuvant therapy was noninferior to anthracycline-based regimens in high-risk, early breast cancer. Full analyses of the studies had proceeded when the prespecified futility boundary was crossed at a planned futility analysis for the ability to demonstrate noninferiority of a nonanthracycline regimen with continued follow-up. These results were presented with 3.3 years of median follow-up. This manuscript reports results of the final analyses of the study efficacy end points conducted with 6.9 years of median follow-up. Long-term analysis of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), the primary end point of the ABC trials, remains consistent with the original results, as noninferiority of the nonanthracycline regimens could not be declared on the basis of the original criteria. The secondary end point of recurrence-free interval, which excluded deaths not due to breast cancer as events, favored anthracycline-based regimens, and tests for heterogeneity were significant for hormone receptor status (P =.02) favoring anthracycline regimens for the hormone receptor-negative cohorts. There was no difference in overall survival, and review of the type of IDFS events in the groups suggested reductions in cancer recurrences achieved with anthracycline regimens were offset by late leukemias and deaths unrelated to breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1344-1349
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume42
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Apr 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Follow-Up of the Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer Trials (USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 [NRG Oncology])'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this