Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multicenter study of anidulafungin and micafungin MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for eight candida species and the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method

  • M. A. Pfaller
  • , A. Espinel-Ingroff
  • , B. Bustamante
  • , E. Canton
  • , D. J. Diekema
  • , A. Fothergill
  • , J. Fuller
  • , G. M. Gonzalez
  • , J. Guarro
  • , C. Lass-Flörl
  • , S. R. Lockhart
  • , E. Martin-Mazuelos
  • , J. F. Meis
  • , L. Ostrosky-Zeichner
  • , T. Pelaez
  • , G. St-Germain
  • , J. Turnidge
  • JMI Laboratories Incorporated
  • University of Iowa College of Medicine
  • VCU Medical Center
  • University Hospital la Fe
  • University of Texas
  • University of Alberta
  • Universidad Autonóma de Nuevo León
  • Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII
  • Medical University Innsbruck
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Hospital Universitario de Valme
  • Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ
  • Radboudumc
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
  • Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec
  • University of Adelaide

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Since epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) using CLSI MICs from multiple laboratories are not available for Candida spp. and the echinocandins, we established ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin on the basis of wild-type (WT) MIC distributions (for organisms in a species-drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) for 8,210 Candida albicans, 3,102 C. glabrata, 3,976 C. parapsilosis, 2,042 C. tropicalis, 617 C. krusei, 258 C. lusitaniae, 234 C. guilliermondii, and 131 C. dubliniensis isolates. CLSI broth microdilution MIC data gathered from 15 different laboratories in Canada, Europe, Mexico, Peru, and the United States were aggregated to statistically define ECVs. ECVs encompassing 97.5% of the statistically modeled population for anidulafungin and micafungin were, respectively, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml for C. albicans, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml for C. glabrata, 8 and 4 μg/ml for C. parapsilosis, 0.12 and 0.06 μg/ml for C. tropicalis, 0.25 and 0.25 g/ml for C. krusei, 1 and 0.5 μg/ml for C. lusitaniae, 8 and 2 μg/ml for C. guilliermondii, and 0.12 and 0.12 μg/ml for C. dubliniensis. Previously reported single and multicenter ECVs defined in the present study were quite similar or within 1 2-fold dilution of each other. For a collection of 230 WT isolates (no fks mutations) and 51 isolates with fks mutations, the species-specific ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin correctly classified 47 (92.2%) and 51 (100%) of the fks mutants, respectively, as non-WT strains. These ECVs may aid in detecting non-WT isolates with reduced susceptibility to anidulafungin and micafungin due to fks mutations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)916-922
Number of pages7
JournalAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter study of anidulafungin and micafungin MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for eight candida species and the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this