Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perceived helpfulness of bipolar disorder treatment: Findings from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys

  • the WHO World Mental Health Survey Collaborators
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Harvard Medical School
  • The University of Queensland
  • The Park Centre for Mental Health
  • Yale University
  • University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine
  • Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mediques
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Publica
  • Pompeu Fabra University
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
  • National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Ulster University
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa
  • Universitat de Barcelona
  • King Saud University
  • Shenzhen Kangning Hospital
  • WSB University
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Aarhus University
  • Servicio Murciano de Salud
  • IMIB-Arrixaca
  • CIBERESP
  • Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca University
  • University of Otago
  • University of Buenos Aires
  • Federal University of Espírito Santo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To examine patterns and predictors of perceived treatment helpfulness for mania/hypomania and associated depression in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Methods: Face-to-face interviews with community samples across 15 countries found n = 2,178 who received lifetime mania/hypomania treatment and n = 624 with lifetime mania/hypomania who received lifetime major depression treatment. These respondents were asked whether treatment was ever helpful and, if so, the number of professionals seen before receiving helpful treatment. Patterns and predictors of treatment helpfulness were examined separately for mania/hypomania and depression. Results: 63.1% (mania/hypomania) and 65.1% (depression) of patients reported ever receiving helpful treatment. However, only 24.5–22.5% were helped by the first professional seen, which means that the others needed to persist in help seeking after initial unhelpful treatments in order to find helpful treatment. Projections find only 22.9% (mania/hypomania) and 43.3% (depression) would persist through a series of unhelpful treatments but that the proportion helped would increase substantially if persistence increased. Few patient-level significant predictors of helpful treatment emerged and none consistently either across the two components (i.e., provider-level helpfulness and persistence after earlier unhelpful treatment) or for both mania/hypomania and depression. Although prevalence of treatment was higher in high-income than low/middle-income countries, proportional helpfulness among treated cases was nearly identical in the two groups of countries. Conclusions: Probability of patients with mania/hypomania and associated depression obtaining helpful treatment might increase substantially if persistence in help-seeking increased after initially unhelpful treatments, although this could require seeing numerous additional treatment providers. In addition to investigating reasons for initial treatments not being helpful, messages reinforcing the importance of persistence should be emphasized to patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-583
Number of pages19
JournalBipolar Disorders
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2021

Keywords

  • bipolar disorder
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • treatment effectiveness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived helpfulness of bipolar disorder treatment: Findings from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this