Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set

  • Matthew P. Horning
  • , Charles B. Delahunt
  • , Christine M. Bachman
  • , Jennifer Luchavez
  • , Christian Luna
  • , Liming Hu
  • , Mayoore S. Jaiswal
  • , Clay M. Thompson
  • , Sourabh Kulhare
  • , Samantha Janko
  • , Benjamin K. Wilson
  • , Travis Ostbye
  • , Martha Mehanian
  • , Roman Gebrehiwot
  • , Grace Yun
  • , David Bell
  • , Stephane Proux
  • , Jane Y. Carter
  • , Wellington Oyibo
  • , Dionicia Gamboa
  • Mehul Dhorda, Ranitha Vongpromek, Peter L. Chiodini, Bernhards Ogutu, Earl G. Long, Kyaw Tun, Thomas R. Burkot, Ken Lilley, Courosh Mehanian
  • Global Health Labs (formerly at Intellectual Ventures Laboratory/Global Good)
  • University of Washington
  • Research Institute for Tropical Medicine
  • formerly Intellectual Ventures Laboratory
  • Creative Creek LLC
  • Arizona State University
  • Independent Consultant
  • Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit
  • Amref Health Africa
  • University of Lagos
  • WWARN
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Defence Services Medical Academy
  • James Cook University
  • Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Manual microscopy remains a widely-used tool for malaria diagnosis and clinical studies, but it has inconsistent quality in the field due to variability in training and field practices. Automated diagnostic systems based on machine learning hold promise to improve quality and reproducibility of field microscopy. The World Health Organization (WHO) has designed a 55-slide set (WHO 55) for their External Competence Assessment of Malaria Microscopists (ECAMM) programme, which can also serve as a valuable benchmark for automated systems. The performance of a fully-automated malaria diagnostic system, EasyScan GO, on a WHO 55 slide set was evaluated. Methods: The WHO 55 slide set is designed to evaluate microscopist competence in three areas of malaria diagnosis using Giemsa-stained blood films, focused on crucial field needs: malaria parasite detection, malaria parasite species identification (ID), and malaria parasite quantitation. The EasyScan GO is a fully-automated system that combines scanning of Giemsa-stained blood films with assessment algorithms to deliver malaria diagnoses. This system was tested on a WHO 55 slide set. Results: The EasyScan GO achieved 94.3 % detection accuracy, 82.9 % species ID accuracy, and 50 % quantitation accuracy, corresponding to WHO microscopy competence Levels 1, 2, and 1, respectively. This is, to our knowledge, the best performance of a fully-automated system on a WHO 55 set. Conclusions: EasyScan GO’s expert ratings in detection and quantitation on the WHO 55 slide set point towards its potential value in drug efficacy use-cases, as well as in some case management situations with less stringent species ID needs. Improved runtime may enable use in general case management settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110
JournalMalaria Journal
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Automated diagnosis
  • Machine learning
  • Malaria
  • Microscopy
  • WHO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of a fully‐automated system on a WHO malaria microscopy evaluation slide set'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this