Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person-centred outcome measure for people with HIV

  • EMERGE Consortium, Horizon 2020
  • King’s College London
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School
  • European AIDS Treatment Group
  • Auckland University of Technology
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
  • University of Toronto
  • University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Despite successful treatment, people living with HIV experience persisting and burdensome multidimensional problems. We aimed to assess the validity, reliability and responsiveness of Positive Outcomes, a patient-reported outcome measure for use in clinical practice. Methods: In all, 1392 outpatients in five European countries self-completed Positive Outcomes, PAM-13 (patient empowerment), PROQOL-HIV (quality of life) and FRAIL (frailty) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis assessed: (a) validity (structural, convergent and divergent, discriminant); (b) reliability (internal consistency, test-retest); and (c) responsiveness. Results: An interpretable four-factor structure was identified: ‘emotional wellbeing’, ‘interpersonal and sexual wellbeing’, ‘socioeconomic wellbeing’ and ‘physical wellbeing’. Moderate to strong convergent validity was found for three subscales of Positive Outcomes and PROQOL (ρ = −0.481 to −0.618, all p < 0.001). Divergent validity was found for total scores with weak ρ (−0.295, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed with worse Positive Outcomes score associated with increasing odds of worse FRAIL group (4.81-fold, p < 0.001) and PAM-13 level (2.28-fold, p < 0.001). Internal consistency for total Positive Outcomes and its factors exceeded the conservative α threshold of 0.6. Test-retest reliability was established: those with stable PAM-13 and FRAIL scores also reported median Positive Outcomes change of 0. Improved PROQOL-HIV score baseline to 12 months was associated with improved Positive Outcomes score (r = −0.44, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Positive Outcomes face and content validity was previously established, and the remaining validity, reliability and responsiveness properties are now demonstrated. The items within the brief 22-item tool are designed to be actionable by health and social care professionals to facilitate the goal of person-centred care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-683
Number of pages11
JournalHIV Medicine
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HIV
  • measurement
  • outcomes
  • person-centredness
  • self-report

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive Outcomes: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a novel person-centred outcome measure for people with HIV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this