Abstract
Studies have addressed cost-effectiveness of syphilis testing of pregnant women in highprevalence settings. This study compares costs of rapid syphilis testing (RST) with laboratory- based rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests in low-prevalence settings in Peru. The RST was introduced in a tertiary-level maternity hospital and in the Ventanilla Network of primary health centers, where syphilis prevalence is approximately 1%. The costs per woman tested and treated with RST at the hospital were $2.70 and $369 respectively compared with $3.60 and $740 for RPR. For the Ventanilla Network the costs per woman tested and treated with RST were $3.19 and $295 respectively compared with $5.55 and $1454 for RPR. The cost per DALY averted using RST was $46 vs. $109 for RPR. RST showed lower costs compared to the WHO standard costs per DALY ($64). Findings suggest syphilis screening with RST is cost-effective in low-prevalence settings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e0149568 |
| Journal | PLoS ONE |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid syphilis testing is cost-effective even in low-prevalence settings: The CISNE-Peru experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver