Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reimagining plant science training in the era of generative artificial intelligence: a global perspective

  • Gaurav D. Moghe
  • , Alen Zimić-Sheen
  • , Dijun Chen
  • , Gitanjali Yadav
  • , Guangshuo Cao
  • , Hale Tufan
  • , Jason Williams
  • , Jędrzej Szymański
  • , Jeongwoon Kim
  • , Lucas Busta
  • , Marek Mutwil
  • , Miguel Verdú
  • , Mirko Zimić
  • , Nicholas J. Provart
  • , Nokwanda Makunga
  • , Olivia Wilkins
  • , Qi Sun
  • , Robert VanBuren
  • , Rose A. Marks
  • , Seung Y. Rhee
  • Yu Jiang, Yuying Xie
  • Cornell University
  • Nanjing University
  • National Institute of Plant Genome Research
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
  • Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
  • Bayer Crop Science
  • University of Minnesota—Duluth
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación – Spanish National Research Council
  • Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function
  • Stellenbosch University
  • University of Manitoba
  • Cornell University
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Cornell AgriTech
  • Department of Computational Mathematics, Science and Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, a deluge of big and diverse datasets from hundreds of plant species, coupled with spectacular innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI), has altered the landscape of plant science. These developments are increasingly democratizing the field, reducing the entry barriers to complex data analysis and enabling a new wave of innovative research while introducing new challenges. Therefore, in this era, it is critical that we train the next generation of plant scientists to be AI-literate, ie, not only proficient in using AI but also vigilant about its pitfalls and biases. In this perspective, we call for six strategic shifts necessary for training the next generation of plant scientists. We argue that while maintaining a core focus on subject expertise, educators should simultaneously emphasize development of new AI-forward pedagogical and evaluation frameworks that reward interdisciplinary and critical thinking, human-driven knowledge synthesis, self-directed learning, and conceptual understanding of workflows. For effective critique and sound interpretations based on biological reality, plant scientists must be explicitly trained in recognizing biases underlying GenAI models. Finally, we highlight the structural barriers hindering the equitable and ethical use of GenAI, where awareness and resolution are critical for sustainable growth of the field. Through the above conceptual framework and numerous plant-science-focused illustrative activities, examples, and resources meant for students and educators alike, this Perspective defines high-level emphasis areas for GenAI-enabled scientific training, aimed at creating a more effective, engaged, and adaptive community of plant scientists.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberkoag140
JournalPlant Cell
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Cite this