Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sociodemographic and dietary correlates of anemia in pregnant women in Peru

  • Theresa W. Gyorkos
  • , Hannah Shenker
  • , Renee Larocque
  • , Maria Del Rosario Ugaz
  • , Eduardo Gotuzzo
  • Montreal General Hospital
  • McGill University
  • McGill University
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this article is to identify sociodemographic and dietary correlates of iron-deficiency anemia among pregnant women in Chanchamayo, Peru. A dietary and socio-demographic survey was conducted among 206 pregnant women in July 2002. Blood analyses were performed to determine the presence of anemia (Hb < 110 g/L) among study participants. A higher prevalence of anemia was found in women from rural (51.2%), compared to semi-urban (32.8%), and urban (31.6%) areas. No significant difference in the prevalence of anemia was found between women with different intakes of various nutrients including total iron and heme iron. However, environmental risk factors were found to be statistically associated with anemia (OR = 2.21; 95%CI: 1.07, 4.53). Factors other than total caloric intake and daily iron intake must be further investigated to explain the significantly higher proportion of anemia in pregnant women living in rural areas. Our evidence suggests that environmental factors including parasitic infection could play an important etiological role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-516
Number of pages20
JournalEcology of Food and Nutrition
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004

Keywords

  • Anemia
  • Developing countries
  • Diet
  • Diet surveys
  • Hookworm infections
  • Iron
  • Peru
  • Pregnancy
  • Rural population
  • Women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sociodemographic and dietary correlates of anemia in pregnant women in Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this