TY - JOUR
T1 - Strengthening Health Systems To Face Pandemics
T2 - Subnational Policy Responses To COVID-19 In Latin America
AU - Knaul, Felicia Marie
AU - Touchton, Michael M.
AU - Arreola-Ornelas, Hector
AU - Calderon-Anyosa, Renzo
AU - Otero-Bahamón, Silvia
AU - Hummel, Calla
AU - Pérez-Cruz, Pedro
AU - Porteny, Thalia
AU - Patino, Fausto
AU - Atun, Rifat
AU - Garcia, Patricia J.
AU - Insua, Jorge
AU - Mendez, Oscar
AU - Undurraga, Eduardo
AU - Boulding, Carew
AU - Nelson-Nuñez, Jami
AU - Guachalla, V. Ximena Velasco
AU - Sanchez-Talanquer, Mariano
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Project HOPE— The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Nonpharmaceutical interventions such as stay-at-home orders continue to be the main policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic in countries with limited or slow vaccine rollout. Often, nonpharmaceutical interventions are managed or implemented at the subnational level, yet little information exists on within-country variation in nonpharmaceutical intervention policies. We focused on Latin America, a COVID-19 epicenter, and collected and analyzed daily subnational data on public health measures in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru to compare within-and across-country nonpharmaceutical interventions. We showed high heterogeneity in the adoption of these interventions at the subnational level in Brazil and Mexico; consistent national guidelines with subnational heterogeneity in Argentina and Colombia; and homogeneous policies guided by centralized national policies in Bolivia, Chile, and Peru. Our results point to the role of subnational policies and governments in responding to health crises. We found that subnational responses cannot replace coordinated national policy. Our findings imply that governments should focus on evidence-based national policies while coordinating with subnational governments to tailor local responses to changing local conditions.
AB - Nonpharmaceutical interventions such as stay-at-home orders continue to be the main policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic in countries with limited or slow vaccine rollout. Often, nonpharmaceutical interventions are managed or implemented at the subnational level, yet little information exists on within-country variation in nonpharmaceutical intervention policies. We focused on Latin America, a COVID-19 epicenter, and collected and analyzed daily subnational data on public health measures in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru to compare within-and across-country nonpharmaceutical interventions. We showed high heterogeneity in the adoption of these interventions at the subnational level in Brazil and Mexico; consistent national guidelines with subnational heterogeneity in Argentina and Colombia; and homogeneous policies guided by centralized national policies in Bolivia, Chile, and Peru. Our results point to the role of subnational policies and governments in responding to health crises. We found that subnational responses cannot replace coordinated national policy. Our findings imply that governments should focus on evidence-based national policies while coordinating with subnational governments to tailor local responses to changing local conditions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85125974344
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00981
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00981
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 35254925
AN - SCOPUS:85125974344
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 41
SP - 454
EP - 462
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 3
ER -