Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sustained antiretroviral effect of raltegravir after 96 weeks of combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection

  • Martin Markowitz
  • , Bach Yen Nguyen
  • , Eduardo Gotuzzo
  • , Fernando Mendo
  • , Winai Ratanasuwan
  • , Colin Kovacs
  • , Guillermo Prada
  • , Javier O. Morales-Ramirez
  • , Clyde S. Crumpacker
  • , Robin D. Isaacs
  • , Havilland Campbell
  • , Kim M. Strohmaier
  • , Hong Wan
  • , Robert M. Danovich
  • , Hedy Teppler
  • Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center
  • Inc.
  • Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia
  • Hospital Nacionale Edgardo Rebagliati
  • Siriraj Hospital
  • Canadian Immunodeficiency Research Collaborative
  • Fundación Santafe de Bogota University Hospital
  • Clinical Research Puerto Rico,Inc
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

107 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltegravir vs efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy after 96 weeks in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection. METHODS:: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of raltegravir (100, 200, 400, or 600 mg twice a day) vs efavirenz (600 mg every day), both with tenofovir/lamivudine (TDF/3TC), for 48 weeks, after which raltegravir arms were combined and all dosed at 400 mg twice a day. Eligible patients had HIV-1 RNA5000 copies per milliliter and CD4 T cells 100 cells per microliter. RESULTS:: One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomized and treated; 160 received raltegravir and 38 received efavirenz. At week 96, 84% of patients in both groups achieved HIV-1 RNA <400 copies per milliliter; 83% in the raltegravir group and 84% in the efavirenz group achieved <50 copies per milliliter (noncompleter = failure). Both groups showed similar increases in CD4 T cells (221 vs 232 cells/uL, respectively). An additional 2 patients (1 in each group) met the protocol definition of virologic failure between weeks 48 and 96; no known resistance mutations were observed in the raltegravir recipient; the efavirenz recipient had nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations. Investigator reported drug-related clinical adverse events (AEs) were less frequent with raltegravir (51%) than efavirenz (74%). Drug-related AEs occurring in >10% of patients in either group were nausea in both groups and dizziness and headache in the efavirenz group. Laboratory AEs remained infrequent. Raltegravir had no adverse effect on total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or on triglycerides. Neuropsychiatric AEs remained less frequent with raltegravir (34%) than efavirenz (58%). There were no drug-related serious AEs in patients receiving raltegravir. CONCLUSIONS:: In antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, raltegravir with TDF/3TC had potent antiretroviral activity, which was similar to efavirenz/TDF/3TC and was sustained to week 96. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated; drug-related AEs were less frequent in patients treated with raltegravir compared with efavirenz.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-356
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral therapy
  • HIV-1
  • Integrase inhibitor
  • MK-0518
  • Raltegravir

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sustained antiretroviral effect of raltegravir after 96 weeks of combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this