Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With STEMI Treated With Fibrinolysis: TREAT Trial

  • Otavio Berwanger
  • , Renato D. Lopes
  • , Diogo D.F. Moia
  • , Francisco A. Fonseca
  • , Lixin Jiang
  • , Shaun G. Goodman
  • , Stephen J. Nicholls
  • , Alexander Parkhomenko
  • , Oleg Averkov
  • , Carlos Tajer
  • , Germán Malaga
  • , Jose F.K. Saraiva
  • , Helio P. Guimaraes
  • , Pedro G.M. de Barros e Silva
  • , Lucas P. Damiani
  • , Renato H.N. Santos
  • , Denise M. Paisani
  • , Tamiris A. Miranda
  • , Nanci Valeis
  • , Leopoldo S. Piegas
  • Christopher B. Granger, Harvey D. White, Jose C. Nicolau
  • Research Institute - Heart Hospital (HCor)
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
  • Federal University of São Paulo
  • Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
  • St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto
  • Monash University
  • Institute of Cardiology
  • Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)
  • Hospital de Alta Complejidad El Cruce
  • Hospital E Maternidade Celso Pierro
  • Auckland City Hospital
  • University of São Paulo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Methods: This international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial enrolled 3,799 patients (age <75 years)with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter)or clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter). The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months. Results: The combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%)receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%)receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.18; p = 0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%)treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%)receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 1.09; p = 0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. Conclusion: Among patients age <75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2819-2828
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume73
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Jun 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • STEMI
  • blinded adjudication
  • dual antiplatelet therapy
  • fibrinolysis
  • myocardial infarction
  • ticagrelor

Cite this