Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR relative expression analysis during cyst-to-early adult development of Taenia solium

  • Jose Maravi
  • , David Castaneda-Cario
  • , Renzo Gutierrez-Loli
  • , Segundo W. Del Aguila
  • , Valeria Villar-Davila
  • , Juan Blume La Torre
  • , Cristina Guerra-Giraldez
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The development of the zoonotic parasitic tapeworm Taenia solium from larval to adult involves significant but often clinically overlooked events crucial in cestode biology. The early-adult events can be studied in vitro, providing a valuable model to examine scolex evagination, strobilation, and worm development. With some transcriptomes being reported, single-gene relative expression analysis using reverse transcription of RNA (RT) followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) is valuable to confirm differential expression and study gene regulation during parasite development. However, accurate comparisons with this approach require the validation of endogenous reference genes (RGs). This study identifies stable RGs for normalizing transcript expression data in Taenia. We examined 12 candidate RGs across three “early tape-worm” phases grown in culture. Transcripts were evaluated with RNA-seq and qPCR. Stability rankings were generated using geNorm and NormFinder (for RNA-seq) and RefFinder (for qPCR). Transcripts for rpl13 and ef1a were ranked as the most stable and were tested by using them to normalize the expression of h2b and wnt11a, involved in proliferation and strobilation processes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0013893
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR relative expression analysis during cyst-to-early adult development of Taenia solium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this