Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Comparison of meglumine antimoniate and pentamidine for Peruvian cutaneous leishmaniasis

  • US Naval Medical Center San Diego
  • Hospital Instituto Peruano Seguro Social
  • NAMRID-Unit 3800
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

93 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Pentamidine was compared with meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime) for 80 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania braziliensis in Peru. Of the 40 patients administered Glucantime (20 mg of antimony [Sb]/kg/day intravenously for 20 days). 31 cured (78%), 6 failed (15%), of which 5 were due to relapse, and 3 were lost to follow-up (7%). Of the 40 patients administered pentamidine (2 mg/kg every other day for seven injections), 14 were cured (35%), 23 failed (58%), and 3 were lost to follow-up (7%). Five pentamidine failures were due to relapse, and 14 failures were due to the presence of parasites two weeks after therapy. Both regimens were well tolerated. Gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and total adverse events were not statistically different in either group. Elevations in levels of liver enzymes and pancreatic enzymes were statistically higher in the Glucantime group, but no patient terminated therapy prematurely. In this study, Glucantime was more effective than pentamidine for treatment of L. braziliensis cutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru based on parasitologic as well as clinical criteria.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)133-137
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volumen72
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - feb. 2005

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Comparison of meglumine antimoniate and pentamidine for Peruvian cutaneous leishmaniasis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto