Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Factors Determining Black Carbon Exposures among Pregnant Women Enrolled in the HAPIN Trial

  • Devan A. Campbell
  • , Michael Johnson
  • , Ricardo Piedrahita
  • , Ajay Pillarisetti
  • , Lance A. Waller
  • , Katherine A. Kearns
  • , Jacob Kremer
  • , Erick Mollinedo
  • , Jeremy A. Sarnat
  • , Maggie L. Clark
  • , Lindsay J. Underhill
  • , John P. McCracken
  • , Anaité Diaz-Artiga
  • , Kyle Steenland
  • , Ghislaine Rosa
  • , Miles A. Kirby
  • , Kalpana Balakrishnan
  • , Sankar Sambandam
  • , Krishnendu Mukhopadhyay
  • , Saritha Sendhil
  • Amudha Natarajan, Florien Ndagijimana, Ephrem Dusabimana, Lisa M. Thompson, William Checkley, Laura Nicolaou, Stella Hartinger, Jennifer L. Peel, Thomas F. Clasen, Luke P. Naeher
  • University of Georgia
  • Benchmark Risk Group
  • Berkeley Air Monitoring Group
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • Rollins School of Public Health
  • Colorado State University
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • Universidad del Valle de Guatemala
  • University of Liverpool
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • Sri Ramachandra Institute for Higher Education and Research
  • Eagle Research Center
  • Emory University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Residential biomass burning is an important source of black carbon (BC) exposure among rural communities in low- and middle-income countries. We collected 7165 personal BC samples and individual/household level information from 3103 pregnant women enrolled in the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network trial. Women in the intervention arm received free liquefied petroleum gas stoves and fuel throughout pregnancy; women in the control arm continued the use of biomass stoves. Median (IQR) postintervention BC exposures were 9.6 μg/m3 (5.2-14.0) for controls and 2.8 μg/m3 (1.6-4.8) for the intervention group. Using mixed models, we characterized predictors of BC exposure and assessed how exposure contrasts differed between arms by select predictors. Primary stove type was the strongest predictor (R2 = 0.42); the models including kerosene use, kitchen location, education, occupation, or stove use hours also provided additional explanatory power from the base model adjusted only for the study site. Our full, trial-wide, model explained 48% of the variation in BC exposures. We found evidence that the BC exposure contrast between arms differed by study site, adherence to the assigned study stove, and whether the participant cooked. Our findings highlight factors that may be addressed before and during studies to implement more impactful cookstove intervention trials.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)10162-10174
Número de páginas13
PublicaciónEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volumen58
N.º23
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 11 jun. 2024
Publicado de forma externa

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 7: Energía asequible y no contaminante
    ODS 7: Energía asequible y no contaminante

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Factors Determining Black Carbon Exposures among Pregnant Women Enrolled in the HAPIN Trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto