TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for the standardized collection of blood-based biomarkers in psychiatry
T2 - Steps for laboratory validity–a consensus of the Biomarkers Task Force from the WFSBP
AU - Andreazza, Ana C.
AU - Laksono, Isabelle
AU - Fernandes, Brisa S.
AU - Toben, Catherine
AU - Lewczuk, Piotr
AU - Riederer, Peter
AU - Kennedy, Sidney H.
AU - Kapogiannis, Dimitrios
AU - Thibaut, Florence
AU - Gerlach, Manfred
AU - Gallo, Carla
AU - Kim, Yong Ku
AU - Grünblatt, Edna
AU - Yatham, Lakshmi
AU - Berk, Michael
AU - Baune, Bernhard T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/5/28
Y1 - 2019/5/28
N2 - Recently, there has been a major shift in the field of psychiatry towards the exploration of complex relationships between blood-based biomarkers and the pathophysiology of psychiatric and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, issues with study reproducibility, validity and reliability have hindered progress towards the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers for psychiatry. The achievement of laboratory validity is a crucial first step for the posterior development of clinical validity. There is evidence that the variability observed in blood-based research studies may be minimised with the implementation of standardised pre-analytical methods and uniform clinical protocols (i.e., pre-venipuncture). It has been documented that errors made in the pre-analytical phase account for 46–68.2% of laboratory testing errors. Thus, standardising clinical assessment, ethical procedures and pre-analytical phase of clinical research is essential for the reproducibility, validity and reliability of blood marker assessment, and reducing the risk of invalid test results. Various other areas of research have already moved towards guidelines for the standardised collection of blood-based biomarkers. Here we aim to provide a set of guidelines that we believe would improve biomarker research: (1) pre-venipuncture information and documentation, (2) ethics of participant consent and (3) pre-analytical methods. Ultimately, we hope this will assist study planning and will improve data comparison across studies allowing for the discovery of biomarkers in psychiatry with both laboratorial and clinical validity.
AB - Recently, there has been a major shift in the field of psychiatry towards the exploration of complex relationships between blood-based biomarkers and the pathophysiology of psychiatric and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, issues with study reproducibility, validity and reliability have hindered progress towards the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers for psychiatry. The achievement of laboratory validity is a crucial first step for the posterior development of clinical validity. There is evidence that the variability observed in blood-based research studies may be minimised with the implementation of standardised pre-analytical methods and uniform clinical protocols (i.e., pre-venipuncture). It has been documented that errors made in the pre-analytical phase account for 46–68.2% of laboratory testing errors. Thus, standardising clinical assessment, ethical procedures and pre-analytical phase of clinical research is essential for the reproducibility, validity and reliability of blood marker assessment, and reducing the risk of invalid test results. Various other areas of research have already moved towards guidelines for the standardised collection of blood-based biomarkers. Here we aim to provide a set of guidelines that we believe would improve biomarker research: (1) pre-venipuncture information and documentation, (2) ethics of participant consent and (3) pre-analytical methods. Ultimately, we hope this will assist study planning and will improve data comparison across studies allowing for the discovery of biomarkers in psychiatry with both laboratorial and clinical validity.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - guidelines
KW - reliability
KW - standardisation
KW - validity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85063400328
U2 - 10.1080/15622975.2019.1574024
DO - 10.1080/15622975.2019.1574024
M3 - Artículo de revisión
C2 - 30907211
AN - SCOPUS:85063400328
SN - 1562-2975
VL - 20
SP - 340
EP - 351
JO - World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
JF - World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -