TY - JOUR
T1 - Health-care provider compliance with a revised Plasmodium vivax radical cure algorithm incorporating tafenoquine and quantitative G6PD testing in the Peruvian Amazon
T2 - a prospective observational study
AU - Vidal-Cardenas, Elisa
AU - De Freitas-Vidal, Catharine I.
AU - Soto-Calle, Veronica
AU - Rodríguez-Ferrucci, Hugo
AU - Casanova, Wilma
AU - Condori-Lizarraga, Ivan
AU - Duparc, Stephan
AU - Jambert, Elodie
AU - Larson, Melanie
AU - Huegel, Heike
AU - Do, Thy
AU - Burela, Paula Alejandra
AU - Lacerda, Marcus
AU - Llanos-Cuentas, Alejandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
PY - 2026/10
Y1 - 2026/10
N2 - Background: Plasmodium vivax relapse remains a key barrier to malaria elimination in Latin America. Historically, radical cure relied on multi-day primaquine regimens, often without prior glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing. In November 2024, WHO issued a recommendation specific to South America for radical cure with primaquine or single-dose tafenoquine after testing G6PD activity. We assessed the operational feasibility of implementing this revised radical cure algorithm, integrating point-of-care quantitative G6PD testing to guide primaquine or tafenoquine selection, under routine care, measured by health-care provider (HCP) compliance. Methods: This prospective, observational study in Loreto, Peru (Aug 2022–Dec 2024) evaluated implementation of a revised radical cure algorithm among patients by trained routine HCPs across 14 health facilities. HCP compliance was assessed from the provider (correct algorithm application in ≥80% of patients per HCP role) and patient perspectives (proportion correctly treated per algorithm). Safety endpoints included acute haemolytic anaemia (AHA) and other serious adverse events. Findings: Among 187 HCPs and 987 patients, HCP compliance was 96.6% (172/178) from the provider perspective and 98.7% (974/987) from the patient perspective, with similar results across urban/periurban and remote/rural facilities. Incorrect treatments (1.3%; 13/987) were mostly due to operational lapses in treatment sequencing and eligibility among G6PD-normal individuals. Ten patients (1.1%; 10/916) developed symptoms suggestive of AHA; one met suspected AHA criteria, unconfirmed. Eight patients (0.8%; 8/986) experienced serious adverse events attributable to severe malaria; all recovered. Interpretation: HCPs across participating facilities achieved high compliance with the revised radical cure algorithm from both perspectives and consistently across urban/periurban and remote/rural settings. Incorrect treatments were infrequent and no AHA was confirmed. These findings demonstrate that HCP at the participating facilities can successfully implement the revised radical cure algorithm, contributing to the operational evidence base informing its scale-up in Peru and the Americas. Funding: Unitaid (Grant number 2021-43-VIV).
AB - Background: Plasmodium vivax relapse remains a key barrier to malaria elimination in Latin America. Historically, radical cure relied on multi-day primaquine regimens, often without prior glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing. In November 2024, WHO issued a recommendation specific to South America for radical cure with primaquine or single-dose tafenoquine after testing G6PD activity. We assessed the operational feasibility of implementing this revised radical cure algorithm, integrating point-of-care quantitative G6PD testing to guide primaquine or tafenoquine selection, under routine care, measured by health-care provider (HCP) compliance. Methods: This prospective, observational study in Loreto, Peru (Aug 2022–Dec 2024) evaluated implementation of a revised radical cure algorithm among patients by trained routine HCPs across 14 health facilities. HCP compliance was assessed from the provider (correct algorithm application in ≥80% of patients per HCP role) and patient perspectives (proportion correctly treated per algorithm). Safety endpoints included acute haemolytic anaemia (AHA) and other serious adverse events. Findings: Among 187 HCPs and 987 patients, HCP compliance was 96.6% (172/178) from the provider perspective and 98.7% (974/987) from the patient perspective, with similar results across urban/periurban and remote/rural facilities. Incorrect treatments (1.3%; 13/987) were mostly due to operational lapses in treatment sequencing and eligibility among G6PD-normal individuals. Ten patients (1.1%; 10/916) developed symptoms suggestive of AHA; one met suspected AHA criteria, unconfirmed. Eight patients (0.8%; 8/986) experienced serious adverse events attributable to severe malaria; all recovered. Interpretation: HCPs across participating facilities achieved high compliance with the revised radical cure algorithm from both perspectives and consistently across urban/periurban and remote/rural settings. Incorrect treatments were infrequent and no AHA was confirmed. These findings demonstrate that HCP at the participating facilities can successfully implement the revised radical cure algorithm, contributing to the operational evidence base informing its scale-up in Peru and the Americas. Funding: Unitaid (Grant number 2021-43-VIV).
KW - Compliance
KW - G6PD testing
KW - Health care provider
KW - Health systems
KW - Implementation science
KW - Latin America
KW - Malaria
KW - Malaria elimination
KW - Malaria treatment guidelines
KW - Mixed-methods research
KW - Operational research
KW - Peru
KW - Plasmodium vivax
KW - Point-of-care diagnostics
KW - Provider behaviour
KW - Radical cure
KW - Real-world evidence
KW - Tafenoquine
KW - Treatment uptake
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044871691
U2 - 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101568
DO - 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101568
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105044871691
SN - 2667-193X
VL - 62
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
M1 - 101568
ER -