Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

How do clinicians prefer cultural competence training? Findings from the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview field trial

  • Neil Krishan Aggarwal
  • , Peter Lam
  • , Enrico G. Castillo
  • , Mitchell G. Weiss
  • , Esperanza Diaz
  • , Renato D. Alarcón
  • , Rob Van Dijk
  • , Hans Rohlof
  • , David M. Ndetei
  • , Monica Scalco
  • , Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola
  • , Kavoos Bassiri
  • , Smita Deshpande
  • , Simon Groen
  • , Sushrut Jadhav
  • , Laurence J. Kirmayer
  • , Vasudeo Paralikar
  • , Joseph Westermeyer
  • , Filipa Santos
  • , Johann Vega-Dienstmaier
  • Luis Anez, Marit Boiler, Andel V. Nicasio, Roberto Lewis-Fernández
  • Columbia University
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
  • University of Basel
  • Yale University
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Parnassia Groep
  • Stichting Centrum '45
  • University of Nairobi
  • University of Toronto
  • University of California, Davis
  • RAMS, Inc
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
  • De Evenaar
  • University College London
  • McGill University
  • King Edward Memorial Hospital
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Central Florida

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

49 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Objective: This study's objective is to analyze training methods clinicians reported as most and least helpful during the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview field trial, reasons why, and associations between demographic characteristics and method preferences. Method: The authors used mixed methods to analyze interviews from 75 clinicians in five continents on their training preferences after a standardized training session and clinicians' first administration of the Cultural Formulation Interview. Content analysis identified most and least helpful educational methods by reason. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis compared clinician characteristics to method preferences. Results: Most frequently, clinicians named case-based behavioral simulations as "most helpful" and video as "least helpful" training methods. Bivariate and logistic regression models, first unadjusted and then clustered by country, found that each additional year of a clinician's age was associated with a preference for behavioral simulations: OR = 1.05 (95 % CI: 1.01-1.10; p = 0.025). Conclusions: Most clinicians preferred active behavioral simulations in cultural competence training, and this effect was most pronounced among older clinicians. Effective training may be best accomplished through a combination of reviewing written guidelines, video demonstration, and behavioral simulations. Future work can examine the impact of clinician training satisfaction on patient symptoms and quality of life.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)584-591
Número de páginas8
PublicaciónAcademic Psychiatry
Volumen40
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ago. 2016

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'How do clinicians prefer cultural competence training? Findings from the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview field trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto