Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Prevalence of and factors associated with negative microscopic diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Peru

  • Ryan Lamm
  • , Clark Alves
  • , Grace Perrotta
  • , Meagan Murphy
  • , Catherine Messina
  • , Juan F. Sanchez
  • , Erika Perez
  • , Luis Angel Rosales
  • , Andres G. Lescano
  • , Edward Smith
  • , Hugo Valdivia
  • , Jack Fuhrer
  • , Sarah Blythe Ballard
  • Stony Brook University School of Medicine
  • NAMRID-Unit 3800
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
  • University of Arizona
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

11 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is endemic to South America where diagnosis is most commonly conducted via microscopy. Patients with suspected leishmaniasis were referred for enrollment by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Lima, Iquitos, Puerto Maldonado, and several rural areas of Peru. A 43-question survey requesting age, gender, occupation, characterization of the lesion(s), history of leishmaniasis, and insect-deterrent behaviors was administered. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted on lesion materials at the Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 in Lima, and the results were compared with those obtained by the MoH using microscopy. Factors associated with negative microscopy and positive PCR results were identified using χ 2 test, t-test, and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Negative microscopy with positive PCR occurred in 31% (123/403) of the 403 cases. After adjusting for confounders, binary multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that negative microscopy with positive PCR was associated with patients who were male (adjusted odds ration [OR] = 1.93 [1.06-3.53], P = 0.032), had previous leishmaniasis (adjusted OR = 2.93 [1.65-5.22], P < 0.0001), had larger lesions (adjusted OR = 1.02 [1.003-1.03], P = 0.016), and/or had a longer duration between lesion appearance and PCR testing (adjusted OR = 1.12 [1.02-1.22], P = 0.017). Future research should focus on further exploration of these underlying variables, discovery of other factors that may be associated with negative microscopy diagnosis, and the development and implementation of improved testing in endemic regions.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)331-337
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volumen99
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2018

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Prevalence of and factors associated with negative microscopic diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Peru'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto