Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention

  • Carlos F. Cáceres
  • , Florence Koechlin
  • , Pedro Goicochea
  • , Papa Salif Sow
  • , Kevin R. O'Reilly
  • , Kenneth H. Mayer
  • , Peter Godfrey-Faussett
  • Network for Multidisciplinary Studies in ARV-Based HIV Prevention (NEMUS)
  • University of California San Francisco
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • World Health Organization
  • Fenway Institute, Fenway Health
  • UNAIDS

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

51 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Introduction: Towards the end of the twentieth century, significant success was achieved in reducing incidence in several global HIV epidemics through ongoing prevention strategies. However, further progress in risk reduction was uncertain. For one thing, it was clear that social vulnerability had to be addressed, through research on interventions addressing health systems and other structural barriers. As soon as antiretroviral treatment became available, researchers started to conceive that antiretrovirals might play a role in decreasing either susceptibility in uninfected people or infectiousness among people living with HIV. In this paper we focus on the origin, present status, and potential contribution of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within the combination HIV prevention framework. Discussion: After a phase of controversy, PrEP efficacy trials took off. By 2015, daily oral PrEP, using tenofovir alone or in combination with emtricitabine, has been proven efficacious, though efficacy seems heavily contingent upon adherence to pill uptake. Initial demonstration projects after release of efficacy results have shown that PrEP can be implemented in real settings and adherence can be high, leading to high effectiveness. Despite its substantial potential, beliefs persist about unfeasibility in reallife settings due to stigma, cost, adherence, and potential risk compensation barriers. Conclusions: The strategic synergy of behavioural change communication, biomedical strategies (including PrEP), and structural programmes is providing the basis for the combination HIV prevention framework. If PrEP is to ever become a key component of that framework, several negative beliefs must be confronted based on emerging evidence; moreover, research gaps regarding PrEP implementation must be filled, and appropriate prioritization strategies must be set up. Those challenges are significant, proportional to the impact that PrEP implementation may have in the global response to HIV.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo19949
PublicaciónJournal of the International AIDS Society
Volumen18
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 20 jul. 2015

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
    ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
  2. ODS 5: Igualdad de género
    ODS 5: Igualdad de género

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The promises and challenges of pre-exposure prophylaxis as part of the emerging paradigm of combination HIV prevention'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto